english support

[Xman]

This is the place where you can get english support.
Language of this thread is english only!

Here you can write about
- support requests
- feature reuqests
- bugreports

[Ace]

What a great mod!- I'm using Xtreme 4.7.1, and it's working very well for me but I have a question:

When in "Transfers" tab looking at either "Uploading" or "in queue", some of the clients in the "Software" column are highlighted in Yellow (such as "Emule 0.46c") and some are not. What is the meaning of the yellow highlighting?

I understand the yellow vs. blue icons in the first column, but I don't understand the purpose of the yellow highlighting of some clients in the last (software) column. Does anyone know what this means?

Also I never get any more "Zambor" spam messages, that's great! However I am seeing in the server log what appears to be spam in the form of repeated entries like: "New message from Fantozzi (IP:87.6.***.***)" is that a new spammer?

Thanks!

[edit by Pathfinder: made the IP address unrecognizable]

[cembob]

Zitat von Ace

When in "Transfers" tab looking at either "Uploading" or "in queue", some of the clients in the "Software" column are highlighted in Yellow (such as "Emule 0.46c") and some are not. What is the meaning of the yellow highlighting?

I understand the yellow vs. blue icons in the first column, but I don't understand the purpose of the yellow highlighting of some clients in the last (software) column. Does anyone know what this means?

The yellow highlighting is indicating users with a low id.

Edit:

Zitat von ACE

Also I never get any more "Zambor" spam messages, that's great! However I am seeing in the server log what appears to be spam in the form of repeated entries like: "New message from Fantozzi (IP:87.6.160.37)" is that a new spammer?

I think that Xman answered to this question in the German thread. If I'm not mixing up things he wrote there that these log-entries can't be suppressed because of something in the original code of the official mule. Nevertheless these clients get banned and you won't see their messages in the message-window. If you don't want to have such entries in your log anymore you have to change your configuration in Options --> Extended --> Verbose.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

[Ace]

Zitat von cembob

The yellow highlighting is indicating users with a low id.

Edit:


Nevertheless these clients get banned and you won't see their messages in the message-window. If you don't want to have such entries in your log anymore you have to change your configuration in Options --> Extended --> Verbose.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

Thanks for the quick and helpful reply.
You are right about the low ID and the fact that the Fantozzi messages don't appear in the message window.
But I'm still not sure why the Zambor no longer appears in the log but the Fantozzi does, but its just curious, not a problem.

[Xman]

There are different Zambors out. Some are using the modstring "zambor". When Xtreme detects such a modstring, it bans this mod immediately. The other zambors don't send any modstring and are only detected after they sent their spam-message.

At the moment the Log-Message of a received Message is beeing printed. That's because
a) the official version handles it this way
b) you can proof that the new spam-ban-feature is working well

Meanwhile I found an easy way to avoid the log-entry after a spam message. The next version won't display it anymore.

[Ace]

Zitat von Xman

At the moment the Log-Message of a received Message is beeing printed. That's because
a) the official version handles it this way
b) you can proof that the new spam-ban-feature is working well

Meanwhile I found an easy way to avoid the log-entry after a spam message. The next version won't display it anymore.

Well it's nice to see the "proof" that the spam ban feature is working well, so there's really no problem with the log messages appearing.
However on the other hand it's really not necessary most of the time so it will be a nice enhancement if you found an easy way to avoid the log entry, it will make an already great mod even better!

Thanks for the reply and the explanation of why I see one spammer in the log but not another!

[kipi25]

Hello,

What a great mod!!! I really enjoy using it!!!!

I have only 1 question:
Will WebCache be added to future versions?

[Pathfinder]

Welcome, kipi25!

The Xtreme MOD won't be supporting WebCache. Xman, it's creator, doesn't belief in that feature. If you ask me, he's right.

In the FAQ at his site he states: the used proxy servers are not meant for p2p traffic. WebCache is misusing them which can lead to the isp's closing them down. This would hurt eMule's reputation.

Despite that, the Xtreme MOD's concept is to be easy in it's use. Since WebCache is a feature that works well only for some people, depending on their isp, it's integration would be contradictory.

[Alekc]

Hi, due to " added sourcecache = finding more sources with less overhead" in version 4.8, i think it would be nice to have feature like autodrop FULLQ/NNS every x minutes.

I think that will be very usefull because now there are much less sources for each file, so they shoul have "higher quality"...

Btw great mod

[Xman]

this is already done within a very advanced mechanismn.

[mononoke]

I'm using v0.46c Xtreme 4.8 version. Thanks to Xman for this great Mod.

I have some problem and feature suggestions:

1. the eMule could not remember my previous set up, for example, the server preference/priority list, the title orders for server page, transfer page and shared files page... how can I solve this problem?

2. Is it possible to bring back 'load all source', 'save all source', 'ask server for more sources'...features back?

3. It would be nice to be able to control the speed while the eMule is minimize so that we don't have to go to 'options' menu to control the speed .

Thanks again

Happy New Year

Mononoke

[seppl12]

Zitat von mononoke

1. the eMule could not remember my previous set up, for example, the server preference/priority list, the title orders for server page, transfer page and shared files page... how can I solve this problem?

Have you done a clean install? I think this could solve the probleme (after that you can copy the preferences.dat, cryptkey.dat, client.met and server.met from your old config folder to you new one.

Zitat von mononoke

2. Is it possible to bring back 'load all source', 'save all source', 'ask server for more sources'...features back?

I think it's not allowed by the official devs.

Zitat von mononoke

3. It would be nice to be able to control the speed while the eMule is minimize so that we don't have to go to 'options' menu to control the speed .

It is not already implemented by minimule?

[mononoke]

Zitat von seppl12

Have you done a clean install? I think this could solve the probleme (after that you can copy the preferences.dat, cryptkey.dat, client.met and server.met from your old config folder to you new one.

No, I did not do a clean install. I will try it. Thanks.

Zitat von seppl12

I think it's not allowed by the official devs.

I see. Too bad.

Zitat von seppl12

It is not already implemented by minimule?

No, I could not control speed in minimule. Is it the same reason for not doing clean installation? Thanks for your answer.

[Xman]

@mononoke
if you have problems with saving your settings a clean install can help. During the last (official) versions some formats of saved data has been changed.

You can't change the speed limit via trayicon... that has a simple reason:
there are some values which depends from the uploadlimit (e.g. slotspeed, max global sources). You should always have a look at this values when changing the uploadlimit. Therefore you have to go to preferences, to change it. It's just one click more.

[requiem]

hello all,
thanks for the great mod but I have some stability and lock up problems. I have no idea why is it happening but , it locks up my computer for 5-10 seconds and turns to normal. At the moment, emule cuts all downloads with sources and DL speed reduces to 0 kb/s, then it jumps to 30 kb/s (my bandwidth allows 24 kb/s max). Do you have any idea about this problem.
I got a screenshot from netlimiter , to explain the situation.


is it about overhead bandwith ??
my system is,
amd athlon XP 2500+ O.C to 3200+
512 kingston ddr 400 mhz
Asus A7N8X-X Board
Windows Xp Pro Sp2

Thanks for the answers..